|
Life [ top ] Works
Criticism
[ top ] Commentary
Roy Foster, review of Ireland: The Politics of Enmity 1789-2006, in London Review of Books (13 Dec. 2007): Nothing Dr Bew writes is without interest. The wearily Olympian judgment was delivered by a distinctly peeved F.S.L. Lyons, doyen of historians of modern Ireland, when faced 27 years ago with a short life of Charles Stewart Parnell which took implicit but cheeky issue with his own magnum opus on the Chief. The young Bew – Belfast-born and a graduate of Peoples Democracy marches as well as of the Cambridge history faculty – had already published a radical marxisant version of the 1879-82 Irish Land War, stressing the only partly suppressed war of interests between large and small tenants as much as the struggle against the landlord oppressor, and casting a cold eye on the cloak of unity that nationalist historiography tried to throw over the enterprise. He would go on to write critiques both of the modern Irish state in the Sean Lemass era and of power relations in Northern Ireland (in collaboration with other figures from Northern Irelands leftist intelligentsia), to redefine the attempted politics of reconciliation in the Edwardian era and to continue the story of land struggle in the years just before World War One. But he would be most publicly known as a sane and sceptical voice on many aspects of the Northern conflict, having returned to a chair at Queens University at a precocious age. Here he moved from a loose identification with the Workers Party to becoming a behind-the-scenes adviser to David Trimble in his brave attempt to bring Unionism to the middle ground of power-sharing with a domesticated Sinn Féin. Bew is allegedly the originator of the pithy identification of Trimbles desired power base as the Prod in the garden centre; the latest stage of his progress is as a peoples peer, entering the Lords as Baron Bew of Donegore (where there is, it so happens, a large and thriving garden centre). It is a pity F.S.L. Lyons isnt around to see. [...] Further remarks: his new survey of Ireland over the longue durée stresses the home-grown varieties of hatred between various entities within the island. And: he has followed Mary-Lou Legg's pioneering work, Newspapers and Nationalism , in tracing how immediately the insights of Benedict Anderson can be mapped onto the growth and form of Irish nationalist consciousness in imagining a community. But his overall preoccupation is with disunion rather than Union. (See online; accessed 6.11.2011.) [ top ] |
||||||||