[Sir] Boyle Roche

Life
1743-1807; entered Army and served in American War; office in Irish Revenue Dept., c.1775; served government as MP for Tralee and later for Gowaran, 1777-83; afterwards Portarlington, 1783-90; Tralee, 1790-97; Old Leighlin, 1798-1800; professed in parliament that the ‘the Revolution of 1782 [Legislative Independence] had brought as many constitutional blessings to the kingdom, as the revolution of 1688’ (27 May 1782); created baronet, 1782; Chamberlain to Viceregal Court, service to Govt. in connnection with Volunteer Convention, 1783; celebrated master of the ‘Irish Bull’ and so characterised in Barrington, Edgeworth, and Froude (‘on posterity’); d. at home in Eccles St., Dublin. RR ODNB DIB ODQ FDA

 

Criticism
Richard Ryan, Biographia Hibernica: Irish Worthies (1821), Vol. II, pp.494-99 [see extract]; The Field Day Anthology of Irish Writing, gen. ed. Seamus Deane (Derry: Field Day 1991), Vol. 2, p.475.

[ top ]

Commentary

Richard Ryan, Biographia Hibernica: Irish Worthies, Vol.II [of 2] (London & Dublin 1821), pp.494-99.

SIR RICHARD BOYLE was descended from an ancient and respectably family, said to be a junior branch of the baronial house of Roche, Viscount Fermoy. He entered the military service of his country very early in life, and distinguished himself eminently in America, during that war, which terminated about the commencement of his late majesty’s reign and [494] in which the immortal Wolfe fell, and particularly at the taking of the Moro fort, at the Havannah. Shortly after his retirement from actual service in the army, he obtained a seat in the Irish House of Commons, of which he continued a member up to the period of the Union. In that assembly he was distinguished as a perpetual appendage to the ministerial establishment, and enjoyed from the government a small pension, together with the office of master of ceremonies at the castle of Dublin, for which he was nationally adapted, by the suavity of his provincial accent, and the good humour and gentlemanly politeness of a soldier of the old school. In Parliament, though his eloquence was not of the most polished or forcible cast, the richness of his national brogue, the humorous oddity of his rhetoric, and a supernatural propensity to that species of figure called the Bull, which might induce an astrologer to suppose him born under the influence of Taurus, rarely foiled to excite continued peals of laughter when he spoke in the house; and of those qualifications the ministers of the day, whom he always supported, constantly availed themselves, whenever the temper of the House required to be relieved from the irritating asperities of warm debate; or whenever the speech of a patriot, perhaps too powerful for refutation, was more conveniently to be answered by ridicule.

On those occasions it was rather amusing to see the worthy baronet, after repeated calls from the treasury benches, rising to answer some of the most splendid orations of Mr. Grattan, Mr. Ponsonby, or Mr. Curran, by observing upon them in his own way. The display made at many of those opportunities by the worthy baronet, though it excited perpetual laughter from the oddity of his language and the happy tropes which usually distinguished his stile of argument, sometimes surprised, by its order of arrangement and apposite point, those who were not in the secret of the worthy baronet’s previous arrangement for the discussion. The truth was, that whatever might have been his pitch of intellect, he was gifted with a most extraordinary memory; and could [495] get off by rote, at one or two readings, any written production of very considerable length. This faculty of his was well known to the ministers whom he supported; and there was rarely a fixed debate on any national subject, in which a part was not previously cast for Sir Boyle to act, and a speech written for him, by some of the grave wags of the treasury benches; which speech was furnished to him in due time for study, and which he contrived to translate into a version of his own. He acted as a sort of buffo the political opera. The late Mr. Edward Cooke, who, in various departments, still acted as a political engineer to the ruling party in Ireland, during the successive administrations of Lord Westmoreland, Lord Camden, and Lord Cornwallis, was known to have composed many of those orations for Sir Boyle. The author knew the whim both of the orator and the audience, and could skilfully anticipate where a peal of laughter could tend to damp the fire of debate, and restore good humour to the disputants; and Sir Boyle was selected as the fittest engine for this purpose.

There were some occasions where the worthy baronet’s eloquence was not previously thought necessary, and of course no speech was prepared for him. But he was an old soldier, and too full of the esprit de corps, to look calmly on the conflict without a zeal for taking his share of the battle. He sometimes, therefore, ventured to volunteer an extempore philippic of his own; and then it was that his native genius shone with all its genuine splendour, pure from the mine, and unmarred by the technical touches of any treasury artist; then it was, that all the figures of national rhetoric, to use the phrase of Junius, “danced the hays through his speech in all the mazes of metaphorical confusion.”

[...]

See full-text in RICORSO > Library [...] > Legacy - via index or as attached. (Para breaks have been added here.)

William Carleton, Traits and Stories (1843 Edn.), ‘I know that several of my readers may remind me of Sir Boyle Roche, whose bulls have become not only notorious, but proverbial. it is well known, however, that when he made them, they were studied bulls, resorted to principally for the purpose of putting the government and opposition of the Irish House of Commons into good humour with each other, which they never failed to do - thereby, on more than one occasion, probably, preventing the effusion of blood, and the loss of life, among men who frequently decided even their political differences by the sword and pistol.’ (General Introduction, p.ii.)

Richard Kain, Dublin in the Age of William Butler Yeats and James Joyce (Oklahoma UP 1962; Newton Abbot: David Charles 1972): ‘[…] there were the outrageous bulls of Sir Boyle Roche, “the most celebrated and entertaining anti-grammarian in the Irish Parliament” [Barrington]. Sir Boyle and his hearers alike recognised the pertinence of his impertinence. His most famous bull was no more illogical than Ireland’s position under English rule. In commenting on the nation's imminent loss of its Parliament (abolished by the Act of Union in 1800), he exclaimed: “It would surely be better, Mr. speaker, to give up not only a part, but, if necessary, even the whole, of our constitution, to preserve the remainder!” (Kain, op. cit., p.8.)

Maureen Wall, ‘The Making of Gardiner’s Relief Act, 1781-82’, in Catholic Ireland in the Eighteenth Century, ed. Gerard O’Brien (Geog. Publ. 1989), writes: ‘;Sir Boyle Roche, who one newspaper referred to during the Convention [of 1782] as “the pack-horse which the Castle has loaded with its lumber of division”, wrote to several prominent Catholics [in Feb. 1784, at the time of the appointment of Duke of Rutland as viceroy] saying that he was convinced that government would further “extend its indulgences” to them if the heads of that body could be induced to present an address to the new lord lieutenant on arrival, “not only of loyalty to the king, but of attachment to the present constitution, without innovation.”’ (See Freeman’s Journal, 22 Nov. 1783; England Life of O’Leary, 114 [sic]; here p.151.)

[ top ]

Notes
Sir Jonah Barrington relates anecdotes of Sir Boyle Roche in Personal Memoirs or Rise and Fall; also that his ‘bovine remarks’ [Irish bull] are covered in ‘A Few of Sir Boyle Roche’s Best’, in Patrick Kennedy, Modern Irish Ancedotes (n.d., 68-70). And note that Barrington on Roche is quoted in Frank O’Connor, Book of Ireland.

Son of Bull: Roche’s celebrated bull, ‘Why should we put ourselves out of the way to do anything for posterity, for what has posterity done for us?’, is a variant on a comic solecism attributed to several speakers in Oxford Dict. of Quotations. Viz., ‘We are always doing”, says he, “something for Posterity, but I would fain see Posterity do something for us.’ (The Spectator, No. 583, 20 August 1714.)

[ top ]