|
Frederick Hervey [Bishop-Earl] (1730-1803) Life
[ top ] Criticism [ top ] Commentary [ top ] Estyn Evans, Irish Folk Ways (1957), accredits the Bishop of Derry with the remark that Ireland possessed nothing curious to engage admiration and nothing horrid enough to stare at. (p.5.) [ top ] Thomas Flanagan, The Irish Novelists 1800-1850 (Columbia UP 1959) - of Irish legislative independence in 1782: [...] Grattan was caught upon a dilemma. He was intent not merely on reform but on the preservation of the constitution and the forms of ordered government, yet the only hope for reform lay with the more {21} swashbuckling elements in the Volunteers. These gentlemen, in confirmation of his apprehensions, descended upon Dublin in armed bodies. Nominally they were under the command of the wan and romantic Lord Charlemont. Their most congenial spirit, however, was the Bishop of Derry, a buoyant and unbalanced personality who had traveled to town ostentatiously protected by the cavalry troop of his nephew George Fitzgerald, later to be hanged after a long and alarming career as a ruffian. (p.21; cites Mary McCarhty, Fighting Fitzgerald and Other Papers, p.81-181 [sic].) [ top ] Hubert Butler, in Escape from the Anthill (1985), remarks on use of Lucretiuss lines for temple of Mussenden, Suave mari magno ... [&], translated as, It is sweet when on the great sea the winds are convulsing the waters to watch anothers struggles from dry land. Not because it delights one that another should be in travail, but because it is sweet to observe what evils you have not endured. [ top ] R. E. Ward & C. Ward, eds., Letters of Charles OConor of Belanagare (Cath. Univ. of America Press 1988), pp.306-09, reports that the Bishop of Derry was the recipient of a long letter from Charles OConor [5 March 1774], relative to the Catholic oath of allegiance to the Hanoverians, which Hervey had suggested they present, along with an abjuration of the temporal authority of the Pope. Note that in the succeeding letter to Daniel McNamara, OConor expresses the hope that our formulary was the one brought in when the Oath was proposed in the Irish House of Commons (p.310), and soon after notes that the Herveyan test is passed into law but the framers have never been suspected of ability, and had they any and were serious, they would not tack a controverted and controvertible proposition on the back of a true one. (p.312). [ top ] Maureen Wall, Catholic Ireland in the 18th c., ed. Gerard OBrien (1989), At the same juncture, Frederick Augustus Hervey, Lord Bristol, then in Rome, was bombarding politicians with warnings of a general exodus of Catholics. He claimed to have knowledge of a planned invasion, with Irish Brigade officers; and later claimed that his information transmitted to Lord North and Lord Hillsborough determined the British governments policy on Catholic relief. [127]. Note also his hand in advancing the Catholic Relief measure of 1778 [see Viscount Taaffe, RX]. FURTHER, . The Bishop of Derry was furious [that the penal statues against the Catholic ecclesiastics remained unaltered by the Relief Act of 1788] because he considered that the people of that persuasion ... hold everything cheap in comparison with their religion and that the masses and clergy would consider the catholics gentlemen sacrificed liberty of religion to the security of property. [133] [ top ] Conor Cruise OBrien, The Great Melody (1992), Hervey, Lord Bristol, sought to have the Catholics of property enfranchised; Rogers (op. cit., p.120) shows that this measure was of limited importance as only 300 to 500 Catholics would thus be enfranchised. See Rev. Francis Rogers, The Irish Volunteers and Catholic Emancipation (London 1934); [247] [ top ] References [ top ] Notes [ top ] | ||||||