|
Life [ top ] Works [ top ] Criticism
[ top ] Commentary
[ top ] Marcus de Burca, Michael Cusack and the GAA (1989): Cusack a burly bearded man; Irish shot-putting champ; resisted Anglo-Irish control of Irish Athletics, which involved among other things the ban on games on Sunday-traditionally, the holiday in Irish villages. By basing his organisation in the Parishes, he dovetailed with local nationalism. He chose summer hurley as the national game. rather than Scots Gaelic shinty favoured at TCD. The ban on foreign games-rugby, soccer, cricket-came the following year [1885] and lasted till 1971. He was tactless and immodest, and was soon pushed aside once the GAA was up and running. Cusack was accorded a monster funeral. (Trevor West, Linenhall Review, April 1991.) [ top ] Anthony Alcock, Understanding Ulster (1994): Under GAA rules, still in force today, members of the British army forces and RUC were barred from membership, doubtless because in its early days its activities also involved drilling for revolution under the guise of training. (p.27.) [ top ] Elaine Sisson, Pearses Patriots: St. Endas and the Cult of Boyhood, Dublin: Four Courts Press 2004): [...] A teacher by profession, [Cusack] ran a well-known crammers institute, Cusacks Academy, in Dublin and encouraged his pupils to engage in physical exercise in their spare time. Originally from Clare, Cusack had seen at first hand the decline of native sports in the western counties in post-Famine times due to a combination of low community morale, poor physical health and emigration. He was angered and frustrated by the fact that most sporting days were organised by the local gentry, who promoted the more genteel sports of horse-riding and cricket at the expense of athletic competitions and Gaelic matches. The rise of cricket in the 1860s, encouraged by local gentry and patronised by members of the community loyal to the Crown, threatened to overshadow Gaelic games and proved to be a motivating factor for Cusack in founding the GAA. / Cusack was convinced that the dominance of Imperial sports was designed to degrade Irishmen by Inveigling them into varieties of sporting competition in which they might readily be defeated. In a series of three articles in the Irish Sportsman, a leading sporting publication in 1881, Cusack outlined the need for an indigenous, nonsectarian, non-class-biased athletic body. Deploring the decline in athletic spirit, Cusack voiced the anxiety that lack of bodily fitness could lead to a fall in public morals. In arguing that lack of public morals would have far-reaching consequences for the nation Cusack was, intentionally or not, echoing similarly stated imperialist concerns. Calling for a central public body to organise local and national competitions, Cusack argued that sport could erase political differences and could function as a bond of unity within a community. He pressed his point that unless communities took regional control of sporting events indigenous sports would be lost altogether. (p.117.) [ top ] Dónal Mac an Ailín (Hist. Dept., NUI Galway), in Letters, The Irish Times (5 March 2007), gives an account of Cusacks repugnance at the snobbery of Irish rugby, which he briefly played, and speaks of his lasting loyalty to Gaelic games after his ousting as secretary of the central committee. He writes: Cusacks main issue with regard to the use of sports grounds was that sections of the Phoenix Park were specially enclosed for polo and cricket - another sport from which he had turned away. In 1887 he declared that the increasing numbers of players in the park on Sundays represented a victory for democratic Christian socialism. / His attitude towards sports of English origin appeared only to harden, meanwhile. He condemned the IRFUs insufferably offensive policies towards the labouring classes, pointing to its refusal to accept the affiliation cheque of the Cork drapers assistants. He later accused the MPs who acted as patrons of London Irish Rugby Club of further anglicising the Irish in that city. He also referred to the Orange Catholics involved in soccer in Dublin (1896). Mac an Ailín concludes: : Practically all leading sports organisations at that time had bans of one form or another, in order to gain the primary sporting allegiance of their members. Hence it was quite natural that Cusack, having experienced the restrictions on membership in other sports, including rugby, supported similar rules in the GAA for its advancement.[...] This does not mean, however, that he was the bigot that later commentators have tried to suggest. He was not an advocate of the ban on RIC members, and he seemed virtually alone in his efforts to attract northern Protestants into the GAA. He was undoubtedly a man of many faults, as seen in his frequent use of invective and constant entrenchment in arguments, but he cannot be pigeonholed, and the historical facts of his life should not be rewritten. [ top ] Manus ORiordan (Finglas, Dublin), in Letters, The Irish Times (5 March 2007): Kieran Fagans Irishmans Diary paid well-deserved tribute to the sporting breadth of vision of GAA founder Michael Cusack (February 24). His column has only one small, but not unimportant, blemish. He writes: James Joyce makes him [ Cusack] a figure of fun as The Citizen in Ulysses [...] Bloom remarked that Christ was a Jew and this made The Citizen apoplectic [...]. / In Micheál Cíosóig (1982), Cusacks Irish-language biographer Liam P. Ó Caithnia insisted that there was nothing anti-Semitic to be found in Cusacks make-up. Furthermore, in a most impressive scholarly article in the Crane Bag, written to mark the Joyce centenary in 1982, the late Gerald Y. Goldberg, Corks only Jewish Lord Mayor, argued no less trenchantly: Those who regard Michael Cusack as the prototype of the character travel a road that leads to nowhere: The Citizen is a composite reconstruction by Joyce of thoughts and sentiments expressed from time to time by Griffith and Gogarty, through their respective writings. The voice may be the voice of Cusack, but the hands and the heads and the thoughts are those of Griffith and Gogarty. / If I may sum up in Joyce-speak: Citizen Cusack was no Blooming anti-Semite. - Yours, &c. [ top ] Notes [ top ] |
||||||